EXORCIST II: THE HERETICÂ (18)
THE EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING (15)
D: Renny Harlin
Warner Bros / Morgan Creek (James G. Robinson)
US 🇺🇸 2004
114 mins
Horror
W: Alexi Hawley [based on a screenplay by William Wisher & Caleb Carr & characters created by William Peter Blatty]
DP: Vittorio Storaro
Ed: Mark Goldblatt & Todd E. Miller
Mus: Trevor Rabin
Stellan Skarsgård (Father Lankester Merrin), Izabella Scorupco (Sarah), James D’Arcy (Father Francis), Remy Sweeney (Joseph), Julian Wadham (Maj. Granville)
A prequel to The Exorcist for audiences who don’t appreciate the mystery, intrigue and ambiguity that was prevalent in the initial film (& book), filmed just a few years after the re-release of the 1973 original to capitalise on its success, which didn’t work as this film was a huge flop.
The Exorcist: The Beginning was actually repurposed from an already completed film (Legion: A Prequel to The Exorcist) that was directed by Paul Schrader, but studio executives had cold feet with that production and shelved it, only to hire Renny Harlin to reshoot some scenes so it could be released under this title.
The plot follows Max Von Sydow’s character, Father Merrin, from the original movie as a younger man, suffering a crisis of faith after World War II when he works at an archaeological dig in Kenya, where an ancient church has been discovered buried beneath the ground, with creepy happenings occurring around the nearby village as they unearth it.
Though Stellan SkarsgĂĄrd delivers a fine performance as the younger Merrin, this really is a mess of a film, far too slow to get going and when it does, it chugs along to an unsatisfying conclusion, with visual effects and makeup that lack any sense of realism, especially when compared to the effects and makeup design from a film that was released three decades earlier.
Paul Schrader’s vision of the same film was released one year later, but also flopped as any potential audience was probably dissuaded to watch it due to this mess.  It’s slightly better than 1977’s “The Exorcist II: The Heretic”, but that’s really not a high bar.
3/10
THE EXORCIST: BELIEVER (15)
D: David Gordon Green
Universal / Morgan Creek / Blumhouse / Rough House (Jason Blum, David C. Robinson & James G. Robinson)
US 🇺🇸 2023
111 mins
Horror
W: Peter Sattler & David Gordon Green [based on the novel by William Peter Blatty]
DP: Michael Simmonds
Ed: Tim Alverson
Mus: David Wingo & Amman Abbasi
Leslie Odom, Jr. (Victor Fielding), Lidya Jewitt (Angela Fielding), Olivia O’Neill (Katherine West), Jennifer Nettles (Miranda West), Norbert Leo Butz (Tony West), Ann Dowd (Ann), Ellen Burstyn (Chris MacNeil), Linda Blair (Regan MacNeil)
Whilst I’m completely in favour of an Exorcist sequel completely retconning the events of “The Exorcist II: The Heretic”, this really isn’t an improvement.  In fact, it’s an insult to the original film.
This attempts to repurpose the original plot, although it’s two girls who are possessed by a malevolent demon following their journey into the woods that sees them go missing & presumed dead for a number of days.  When they are found, they believe that only a few hours has passed, but it doesn’t take long for them to start speaking with a raspy voice & appear in some rather shoddy makeup.
Ellen Burstyn pops up in a cameo to blame the events of the original film on “toxic masculinity” before the plot gives her an excuse to sit down (mostly off-screen) for the rest of a movie, before an effects-heavy finale that is more comical than it is scary, culminating in Linda Blair coming out of nowhere to accept her appearance fee immediately prior to the end credits.
Leslie Odom, Jr. is probably the film’s only saviour, delivering a good performance that the ropey screenplay did not deserve.  The two juvenile actresses playing the young girl’s are also fine for the most part, but the majority of the other acting performances are quite embarrassing, especially from the legendary Ellen Burstyn, who looks as though she can’t wait to spend the appearance money on a nice holiday somewhere warm.
The 1973 Exorcist still holds up, and has plenty to analyse for multiple rewatches. Give insipid trash like this a wide berth and revisit the original instead.
2/10